=================================================================== CERT-Renater Note d'Information No. 2022/VULN236 _____________________________________________________________________ DATE : 06/07/2022 HARDWARE PLATFORM(S): / OPERATING SYSTEM(S): Systems running ujson (pip) versions prior to 5.4.0. ====================================================================https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/security/advisories/GHSA-wpqr-jcpx-745r https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/security/advisories/GHSA-fm67-cv37-96ff _____________________________________________________________________ Incorrect handling of invalid surrogate pair characters Moderate hugovk published GHSA-wpqr-jcpx-745r Package ujson (pip) Affected versions < 5.4.0 Patched versions 5.4.0 Description Impact What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? Anyone parsing JSON from an untrusted source is vulnerable. JSON strings that contain escaped surrogate characters not part of a proper surrogate pair were decoded incorrectly. Besides corrupting strings, this allowed for potential key confusion and value overwriting in dictionaries. Examples: # An unpaired high surrogate character is ignored. >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uD800"') '' >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uD800hello"') 'hello' # An unpaired low surrogate character is preserved. >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uDC00"') '\udc00' # A pair of surrogates with additional non surrogate characters pair up in spite of being invalid. >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uD800foo bar\uDC00"') 'foo bar𐀀' Patches Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? Users should upgrade to UltraJSON 5.4.0. From version 5.4.0, UltraJSON decodes lone surrogates in the same way as the standard library's json module does, preserving them in the parsed output: >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uD800"') '\ud800' >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uD800hello"') '\ud800hello' >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uDC00"') '\udc00' >>> ujson.loads(r'"\uD800foo bar\uDC00"') '\ud800foo bar\udc00' Workarounds Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Short of switching to an entirely different JSON library, there are no safe alternatives to upgrading. For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: Open an issue in UltraJSON Severity Moderate CVE ID CVE-2022-31116 Weaknesses CWE-228 Credits @JustAnotherArchivist JustAnotherArchivist @the-bumble the-bumble _____________________________________________________________________ Potential double free of buffer during string decoding Low hugovk published GHSA-fm67-cv37-96ff Package ujson (pip) Affected versions < 5.4.0 Patched versions 5.4.0 Description Impact What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? When an error occurs while reallocating the buffer for string decoding, the buffer gets freed twice. Due to how UltraJSON uses the internal decoder, this double free is impossible to trigger from Python. Patches Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? Users should upgrade to UltraJSON 5.4.0. Workarounds Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? There is no workaround. For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: Open an issue in UltraJSON Severity Low CVE ID CVE-2022-31117 Weaknesses CWE-415 Credits @JustAnotherArchivist JustAnotherArchivist ========================================================+ CERT-RENATER | tel : 01-53-94-20-44 + + 23/25 Rue Daviel | fax : 01-53-94-20-41 + + 75013 Paris | email:cert@support.renater.fr + =======================================================